Login Register

Ashflats developer may appeal after Stafford planners reject bid for 320 homes

By Staf Newsletter  |  Posted: February 28, 2014

By Gail Atkinson

Ashflats developer may appeal after Stafford planners reject bid for 320 homes
Comments (3)

A DEVELOPER whose application to build up to 320 homes on a greenfield site was refused has complained to planners and say they may appeal.

Stafford-based Milwood Land say they spent hundreds of thousands of pounds having been told the application for land between Ashflats and the A449 Moss Pit, would be recommended for approval.

They also claim there are no planning grounds to reject the proposals which brought objections from more than 50 residents.

The company has sent its letter to every member of Stafford Borough Council’s planning committee after they rejected the plans.

Related content

Members said it would be “absolute lunacy” to put a new junction on what they said was Stafford’s busiest road.

The applicant’s letter said: “The site will produce 94 badly needed affordable homes in a very short time frame as we are already negotiating this with your selected provider South Staffs Housing and will help considerably with your council’s massive shortfall of provision of affordable housing.”

In a report to the committee planning officers said they had a five-year supply of housing.

Milwood said: “We question your officer’s statement on the five-year supply and no doubt we and many others in the pipeline will again test this on appeal if necessary.

“Nowhere in the National Planning Policy Framework does it say planning approval should not be given even if the council has a five-year supply.”

The application has been called in by Councillor Geoff Rowlands because of concerns about access to the A449 and the authority’s planning committee will consider the application tomorrow (FRI).

Councillor Bryan Cross said: “It is absolute lunacy to put an access at this point.”

Councillors voted by 11-0 to reject the plan saying the site lay outside the planning boundary and there were more suitable sites available in the town.

Read more from Staff Newsletter

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters

3 comments

  • countrygirl11  |  May 14 2014, 9:38AM

    this has gone to appeal. the battle commences yet again.

    Rate   2
    Report
  • countrygirl11  |  May 08 2014, 11:19AM

    in spite of overwhelming opposition to this ridiculous proposal milwood Stafford paul shaw has resubmitted

    Rate   3
    Report
  • countrygirl11  |  March 03 2014, 1:55PM

    the developers letter is shocking, its clear he is accusing the council of something, maybe he should back off and admit defeat, no one wants this development on this green field site full of wildlife and no one wants a junction on this railway bridge.

    Rate   4
    Report

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES